Judicial review notes in Tanzania (grounds, procedures, cases+pdf)

These are easy-to-understand Judicial review notes for law students in Tanzania.

You don’t need any other notes as far as Judicial review in Tanzania is concerned, here you will find everything you need to know about this topic.

Let’s get started

What is Judicial Review

Judicial review is the way through which the court controls the actions of administrative bodies.

In Judicial review, the court reviews and scrutinizes the validity of the acts, decisions, instruments, or any transaction performed by administrative bodies.

De Smith in his book Judicial Review of Administrative Action (1968) (2nd Ed.), p. 23 defines judicial review to mean Judicial scrutiny and determination of the legal validity of instruments, acts, decisions, and transactions of administrative organs.

Judicial Review in Tanzania

Judicial review is recognized in Common Law jurisprudence as the means of controlling the excesses of power by public officials.

Judicial review is an inherent jurisdiction vested in the High Court.

That means all Judicial Review applications must be lodged in High Court.

The Constitution is the fundamental law in respect of the inherent powers of the High Court.

In Tanzania, the law which is relevant in the application for judicial review and its remedies is the Law Reform (Fatal Accidents) Miscellaneous Provisions Act Cap 310 R.E 2019 (the Act) together with Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Judicial Review Procedure and Fees) Rules 2014 (the Rules)

The provisions of sections 17-19 are relevant in respect of the remedies afforded when a Judicial Review is invoked.

Historical Development of Judicial Review

Historically in Britain, Judicial Review was a means of controlling public power developed in a very limited fashion.

Judicial Review was used as the means by which the King tried to control various inferior bodies, largely inferior adjudicative bodies (tribunals, inquiries) than administrative bodies.

Judicial Review was influenced by approaches/notions of private law rather than public law.

The scope of Judicial Review was limited on

  • Was there a public right infringed?
  • What kind of remedies?

Because the remedies of Judicial Review emanated (came) from the King were called PREROGATIVE ORDERS.

What is the Rationale for Judicial Review?

The essence of judicial review is to ensure that statutory powers are not; Usurped, Exceeded, or abused and that procedural and substantive duties are complied with.

Grounds for Judicial Review

Lord Diplock in Council of Civil Service Union v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 stated three major grounds of Judicial Review that is Illegality, Irrationality, and Procedural impropriety.

Illegality

Illegality happens to be a ground for judicial review when administrative bodies do something that is against the law.

Under Illegality, one can challenge;

  1. Excess of jurisdiction
  2. Absence of power
  3. Unlawful delegation
  4. An error of law on the face of records
  5. Improper motive/purpose

All these, when done by an administrative authority, constitute illegality. Thus judicial review can be invoked to seek remedies.

Irrationality

Irrationality happens to be a ground of judicial review when administrative bodies do something irresponsibly.

Irrationality constitutes of;

Failure to exercise discretion

Sometimes the authority is required to apply its mind to the facts and circumstances of the case at hand.

If one is acting mechanically, that is, without due care and caution or without a sense of responsibility in the exercise of discretion, then there is a failure to exercise discretion.

Unreasonableness

Lord Wrenbury in Roberts v Hopwood [1925] AC 578 stated that;

“A discretion does not empower a man to do what he likes merely because he is minded to do so-he must in the exercise of his discretion do, not what he likes, but what he ought. In other words, he must, by use of his reason, ascertain and follow the course which reason directs. He must act reasonably.”

Acting under dictation

This happens when a body entrusted with certain powers of carrying out decisions surrenders such power under the influence of another authority that has not been conferred such as by the law.

Other factors for Irrationality include

  • Irrelevant consideration
  • Mala fide
  • Fettering discretion

Procedural Impropriety

Procedural Impropriety happens to be a ground of judicial review when administrative bodies do something without observing the proper procedure.

Procedural Impropriety includes;

  • Failure to follow statutory procedures
  • Breach of rules of natural justice
    • These include;
    • The audi alteram partem-Right to be heard
    • The Nemo Judex in causa sua-Rule against Bias
    • The Nullum Arbtrium sine rationibus-Right to be given reasons for the decision made
  • The doctrine of legitimate expectation

In Tanzania, the grounds of judicial review were stated by the Court of Appeal in the case of SANAI MURUMBE AND ANOTHER v MUHERE CHACHA [1990] TLR 54 (CA) where the court stated;

“The High Court is entitled to investigate the proceedings of a lower court or tribunal or public authority on any of the following grounds, apparent on the record.

  • One, that the subordinate court or tribunal or public authority has taken into account matters which it ought not to have taken into account.
  • Two, that the court or tribunal or public authority has not taken into account matters which it ought to have taken into account.
  • Three, lack or excess of jurisdiction by the lower court.
  • Four that the conclusion arrived at is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could ever come to it.
  • Five, rules of natural justice have been violated.
  • Six, the illegality of procedure or decision

Procedures for applying for Judicial Review

Judicial Review is not like appeal.

One can only go for judicial review if there is no room for other alternative remedies.

It is an avenue that is not always open to any person.

The stages for the application of judicial review are;

  1. Application for leave to institute a case
  2. Substantive Application
  3. Hearing of the case

Application for leave to institute a case

Before the substantive application of Judicial review is lodged, an applicant must first seek leave (permission) to file the same.

This Leave is sought through a Chamber Summons supported by an affidavit sworn by an applicant or his or her lawyer stating the facts and grounds supporting the application.

Just use the format of form A as provided under the First Schedule of the rules.

The enabling provision for this matter includes sections 2 (1) and (3) of the
Judicature and Application of Laws Act, Cap 358 R.E. 2019; section 18(1) and 19 (1) (2) (3) of the Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, Cap 310 R.E. 2019; and Rule 5(1), (2) and (3) of the Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Judicial Review Procedure and Fees) Rules 2014.

📚 Unlock the full notes on the Portal

You've reached the free preview. Read the complete notes — plus quizzes, timed exam simulations, legal templates and the AI study assistant — on the Tanzania Law Students Portal.

Free forever plan available • Mobile money payments only

Share this post

Leave a Reply